The Prince’s War on Drugs
https://phistars.blogspot.com/2012/12/the-princes-war-on-drugs.html
Editor's Note: This post is really weird. My politics teacher had asked me to write a letter as one historical political guy and respond the letter of another historical dude. These letters were supposed to address a modern day problem. My letters addressed the War on Drugs. Here Machiavelli, mocks Sir Thomas Moore solutions to the War on Drugs. Iam supposed to mimic their frame of mind. This is an exercise that helps you understand the minds of those classical political writers. It is also an interesting literary exercise. I think my essay was written rather well. I am so, 5 stars worthy.
The
Prince’s War on Drugs
To
Estimated Friend Sir Thomas Moore,
I find your little fiction quite
fictional indeed. It does not surprise me that you would try to solve a modern
problem with abstracted nonsense. Truly, not only I, but the whole world is
aware that there is no such thing as you Utopia or your mail correspondent
Raphael Nonsense. I suppose that, in the end all, you will always be a political
fiction writer and nothing more, Mr. Moore. Alas, it is best to approach this
problem with drugs with real modern life solutions.
For
starters, the treatment of the providers for the addicts is far too lenient. Indeed, the President should “be prudent
enough to know how to escape the infamy of those vices that would take the
state away from him” (Machiavelli, Pg 54). Truly, he must pay keen attention to
these forces that disseminated dissension and distress within his principality.
I am not asking for a mass search and destroy of every addict and low life
seller that exist within the American principality. The President “… need not
concern himself unduly if he ignores these less serious vices.” (Machiavelli,
Pg 54). He should not feel hesitant to use extreme force against internal
providers that bring dissension to his principality.
In
order to handle internal suppliers it is best for the President to send “a
cruel and unscrupulous man” like “Messer Remirro de Orco” (Machiavelli, Pg 27) to
handle the heads of the internal drug mafia. The President should not feel uneasy
about taking such a measure because “it is easy to convince” the population about
harmful effects of drug trafficking “but difficult to
hold them in that conviction.” (Machiavelli, Pg 21). For that reason, a modern
day De Orco is necessary.
Afterwards,
the President should give this ruthless minister full authority over that
hostile territory, like de Orco. In
short amount of time I am certain that he will “reduced the territory to “a
peaceful and united state, and in so doing…” the President will “greatly increased
his prestige” (Machiavelli, Pg 27). However, the President should take measures
to avoid the hatred of those he has brought into submission. Thus, he should
send out a statement claiming “if any form of cruelty had occurred, it did not
originate from him but from the violent nature of his minister.” (Machiavelli,
Pg 27). In doing so, he will divert the populations’ hatred from himself to his
minister.
As
for his execution, it would be preferred that his minister’s “body laid out in two
pieces on” Lincoln Memorial “with a block of wood and a bloody sword beside it.”
(Machiavelli, Pg 27). It is a pity that such medieval spectacles are no longer
in usage. Nay, if it cannot be helped, then let that ruthless minister get the
lighting chair. Let that solemn hour be seen in all the magic boxes of President
Barak Obama’s principality. “The ferocity
of such a spectacle” will leave the “population satisfied and stupefied at the same time.” (Machiavelli, Pg
27) I am certain that after such a
spectacle no one will dare to sell opiates in the United Principalities of
America.
The
foreign providers must be handled with a different sort of necessary cruelty.
In order to facilitate future necessary cruelties, this principality should
avoid by all means taking auxiliary forces from countries like Russia, China,
or the European Union. These foreign allies that are stronger than or as strong
as the US Principality would “disturb the political balance” (Machiavelli, Pg
25). It is best for the American Principality to be the sole ally in that
foreign nation’s war on drugs. By being the sole powerful auxiliary, the
foreign nation would be compelled to follow this Principalities method more
readily.
As
for the foreign providers, they should be killed and not be shown any mercy.
They should not offer “monetary rewards” for traitors that offer their leaders
in exchange for recompense (The Prince part 2 Notes). Rather, only offer then
life instead of death for their cooperation. After, the head drug Princes are
brought into submission, it would be adviced to have then killed in a similar De
Orco fashion. However, the US Principality should leave the survivor’s property
and women unharmed. Men generally are more “avoiders of danger, and greedy”
(Machiavelli, Pg 58). By having just the main heads of the drug Principalities beheaded
the American Principality will foster fear instead of hatred. Thus, the new
subdued principality will be “… hesitant about injuring” a President and his
Principality “who makes… himself feared.” (Machiavelli, Pg 58).
As
you can see Sir Thomas Moore, virtu is the only thing that can win the war on
drug. Your ideas about virtue and Utopia are unrealistic and cannot bring peace
upon the US principality. If you bride the drug lords you will only give them
means to continue their knavery. For men, after all, are “ungrateful, fickle, simulators and deceivers,
avoiders of danger, and greedy for gain” (Machiavelli, Pg 58). One cannot trust
them to pursue the common good without fear keeping their temper in check. I
truly hope my letter will enlighten you about the true nature or men and how to
keep it restrained.
Sincerely yours,
Niccolo Machiavelli
Work cited
Page
Machiavelli, Niccolo The Prince Oxford University Press.
2005